David Erhan Debunked

In this video we debunk many arguments against the Filioque used by David Erhan and others such as Photius and Gregory Palamas. 0:00 Introduction 0:59 St. Theophilus of Antioch 2:38 Intransferrability of Hypostatic Properties 10:35 St. Dionysius the Areopagite 14:27 John 15, 26 18:15 Oration 34 22:35 Uncaused cause 27:24 Confuses Hypostatic Property 29:02 St. Ambrose Economic Procession 31:27 Letter to Marinus 42:14 Procession vs. Generation 45:34 St. Basil Letter 38 47:02 St. John Damascene 47:40 Letter 171 49:17 Two Silver Shields 50:55 Creed 381 51:33 Filioque Subordinates 53:40 Infinite Processions 54:35 Common or Proper 59:40 Why does the Son spirate? 1:01:11 Filioque = Composition 1:01:33 Two Principles 1:02:15 Merge the Persons 1:03:30 Essential or Hypostatic 1:04:04 Conclusion 1:05:14 Pray for S. Correction: At 31:14 I meant St. Ambrose not St. Hilary Link to Slides: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mpnoif4sAbIbWNN6eqNGzuJ-DWV7YGA-/view?usp=drive_link Free PDF of my book: https://www.academia.edu/123425101/The_Filioque_Answering_the_Eastern_Orthodox Physical Book: https://www.amazon.com/Filioque-Answering-Eastern-Orthodox/dp/B0DFV4SCFT Twitter: https://x.com/CatholicDwong Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/catholicdwong/ Discord: CatholicDwong